On June 11, the DOJ and Department of Homeland Security delivered a powerful blow in the ongoing crackdown on illegal immigration involving unaccompanied minors, announcing the indictment of three Guatemalan nationals in Ohio. 

Maritza Azucena Cahuec Coc, aged 38 an alleged leader of the scheme, her brother Carlos Agustin Cahuec Coc, aged 33, and Gladys Marina Caal Chen now face 19 serious counts, including conspiracy to encourage and induce aliens to enter the United States illegally, smuggling, fraud through false statements to the Office of Refugee Resettlement, identity theft, and related offenses.

The scheme reportedly operated from around December 2020 to October 2023, involving fraudulent sponsorship applications that used stolen identities, fake birth certificates, and Guatemalan consular IDs to gain custody of more than a dozen unrelated unaccompanied minors, some of whom were allegedly coerced into lying to officials. 

A search of one residence in Cleveland revealed crowded living conditions with multiple adults and minors, exemplifying the dangers of networks. 

These charges align with broader recovery efforts, as the Trump administration has located over 146,000 previously missing children through wellness checks, door knocks, and interagency coordination, while pursuing aggressive measures to resolve the remaining unaccounted cases.

The Biden-Harris administration saw volumes like never before, hundreds of thousands processed through the system, with roughly 450,000 referred to the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) in key years. The majority of these children were ultimately released to sponsors across the country.

This surge of unaccompanied minors actually began under the Obama administration in 2014, when a record number of youths arrived at the U.S. Mexico border. That year alone saw 68,541 apprehensions, prompting the opening of temporary shelters and early efforts to address root causes in Central America.

Since first being elected in 2016, President Trump has made border security the top priority of his America First agenda. 

In his current administration, Republicans, the Department of Justice, and allied federal agencies have aggressively pushed this strategy forward by streamlining enforcement, strengthening vetting and follow-up, and dismantling the networks that exploit vulnerable minors.

With the strong support of Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-WY), a vocal advocate for border security and child protection, these enforcement efforts have gained even more prominence.

As a member of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Hageman is deeply engaged in immigration enforcement and human trafficking issues. She has repeatedly highlighted the devastating human cost of previous policies that left hundreds of thousands of migrant children unaccounted for. Her commentary reveals how lax vetting enabled smugglers, often tied to cartels to prey on minors, treating them as commodities in a lucrative underground trade.

Recent announcements detail the location of over 146,000 previously missing migrant children. Under the current administration, officials have reported meaningful progress in tracking these minors, many of whom were released to sponsors during prior years. 

However, nearly 300,000 remain un-located. This situation raises serious alarms about the risks of exploitation. These risks involve labor trafficking sexual abuse as well as additional forms of harm. Investigations now target over 15,500 high volume sponsors. These sponsors include individuals, households as well as organizations. Such sponsors took in multiple unrelated children, often more than three under minimal background checks.

Authorities have pointed to rushed processes and sanctuary policies as factors that enabled such abuse, with reports indicating significant vulnerabilities, including assaults faced by a notable portion of female migrants. This has prompted deeper probes into how children were placed into exploitative situations.

Broader enforcement complements these indictments. Operations under the Trump administration’s Joint Task Force Alpha, which coordinates efforts across DHS, DOJ, HHS, ICE, and other agencies; continue to target human smuggling and trafficking networks involving minors that have crossed the border illegally. 

These efforts intersect with broader initiatives, such as the FBI’s Operation Iron Pursuit, which identified over 200 child victims and led to the arrest 

of more than 350 offenders in coordinated nationwide actions against child exploitation. While some efforts address sexual exploitation more broadly, they intersect directly with smuggling by targeting traffickers who move minors across borders for profit. 

The task force prioritizes comprehensive background checks, extended ORR custody when warranted, DNA testing in appropriate cases, and the elimination of loopholes that enabled rapid sponsor releases with minimal oversight; moving away from basic phone wellness checks toward thorough in-person verification and on-site assessments.

Border encounters for migrant children have reportedly decreased significantly under this administration’s new enforcement and policies.

Hageman and her allies have exposed the failures that have empowered smugglers under earlier approaches. 

Previous policies created incentives for cartels and coyotes to exploit children for entry, often pairing them with unrelated adults or sending them out alone. Stronger vetting, database enhancements, and stricter penalties aim to disrupt this cycle. 

The succesful location of 146,000 lone migrant children and the focus on high-volume sponsors are central to the accountability push announced on June 11, 2026.  

In prior administrations, after DHS or ICE apprehension, many minors were transferred to HHS ORR and placed with sponsors, often claimed relatives or other individuals in the U.S. Follow-up was frequently limited, with officials sometimes skipping basic procedures such as fingerprints and background checks, while long-term tracking was inadequate, including frequent failures to issue Notices to Appear for immigration court.

These actions demonstrate a clear commitment to child safety over previous border leniency. Publicizing indictments and recoveries aims to deter future smuggling, restore public trust, and warn predators that federal prosecutions are actively targeting those who exploit the system, despite ongoing challenges from some local authorities.

Continued oversight, potential new legislation, and interagency coordination will be essential to sustaining these gains and preventing recurrence.

The major surges under both Presidents Obama and Biden have heightened concerns regarding how weak enforcement of immigration policies drove increased migrant flows and affected overall outcomes.

The America First approach under President Trump focuses not only on strong border enforcement but also on directly confronting exploitation risks through wellness checks, door knocks, thorough investigations, and removals where appropriate. 

Government audits and oversight reports have repeatedly documented serious gaps in sponsor vetting and follow-up, with nearly 300,000 missing child migrants now unaccounted for, far more than mere administrative issues.

Under President Trump’s leadership, this strategy has delivered record results by dramatically reducing illegal border crossings, dismantling smuggling networks, and restoring accountability. This enforcement embodies the core of the America First agenda by securing the border, protecting vulnerable children, and ensuring that those who exploit the system face justice.

President Donald J. Trump has quietly delivered one of the most consequential advances for constitutional liberty in modern history: a sweeping rollback of gun control measures that rivals his appointment of three originalist Supreme Court justices to obtain the most significant pro-life victory in history through the repeal of Roe v. Wade. President Trump’s second-term actions have fortified the 2nd Amendment against decades of bureaucratic erosion and activist overreach. These victories remain underreported because they empower law-abiding Americans rather than expanding government control.

President Trump’s SCOTUS appointments transformed the judiciary on more issues than only abortion. New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022) stands as a landmark. The Court struck down New York’s “proper cause” requirement for concealed carry permits, affirming that the right to bear arms extends beyond the home for self-defense. Justice Clarence Thomas’s majority opinion established a clear text-and-history test: regulations must align with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm ownership. This ruling unleashed a wave of successful challenges to restrictive state laws, shifting the legal battlefield decisively toward constitutional carry and individual rights—allowing conservatives to go on the offense. Lower courts, guided by this framework, have invalidated numerous infringements that once seemed hopelessly entrenched.

Building on this judicial foundation, Trump’s administration and Republican-led Congress have expanded gun rights. The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” signed last year, eliminated the archaic $200 National Firearms Act (NFA) tax on suppressors, short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and other items long burdened by Depression-era restrictions. Enacted in 1934 as a revenue-generating measure, this tax had morphed into an unconstitutional barrier to lawful ownership. Its repeal—coupled with streamlined processes—makes these tools more accessible for self-defense, hunting, and sport shooting, particularly suppressors that protect hearing and reduce noise pollution in rural communities. Gun rights advocates have rightly hailed this as the most significant deregulation since the NFA’s passage.

The administration has aggressively defended these gains through litigation, refusing to cede an inch to the Left. The DOJ, under President Trump’s leadership, has filed lawsuits against states like Colorado and cities like Denver over assault weapons bans and magazine capacity limits, invoking Bruen to argue these measures violate the 2nd Amendment. Virginia’s recent restrictions faced swift pushback from Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, as she said: “See you in court.” This proactive posture contrasts sharply with prior administrations’ deference to blue-state infringements, choosing to surrender rather than engage in the fifht. The DOJ’s Civil Rights Division now includes a dedicated Second Amendment Enforcement Task Force, treating gun rights violations with the seriousness deserved for all constitutional protections.

Perhaps most transformative—and least heralded—is the reorienting of the ATF, an agency with a notorious history of abusing power against law-abiding citizens and patriots. From the tragedies at Ruby Ridge in 1992, where ATF actions contributed to the callous murders of a woman and child, to the fiery siege at Waco in 1993 in which dozens were burned alive due to the despotic actions of Clinton-era federal thugs, the ATF has too often functioned as a weaponized ideological sledgehammer rather than a focused steward of public safety and the rights of the people. Conservatives have long viewed it with well-deserved hostility as a result.

Under President Trump, that dynamic has changed drastically. The administration repealed Biden’s “zero tolerance” policy that aggressively revoked Federal Firearms Licenses (FFLs) for dealers, often over minor paperwork issues. Revocations plummeted by 69 percent, and revoked dealers were invited to reapply. Excessive enforcement targeting gun dealers has been curtailed, with a new Administrative Action Policy emphasizing public safety and traceability over immaterial errors. ATF agents have been reassigned in large numbers to support ICE immigration enforcement and mass deportations—priorities that directly enhance border security and reduce crime linked to illegal immigration. Budget proposals include significant downsizing, redirecting resources away from harassing compliant dealers toward genuine threats.

This isn’t neglect of safety; it’s a strategic refocusing of the agency in line with DOGE principles. ATF launched a “New Era of Reform” with 34 regulatory changes streamlining paperwork, reducing burdens on dealers and owners, and aligning rules with court precedents and practical realities. Proposals include modernizing background check validity periods and record retention, ending rules on pistol stabilizing braces that criminalized common configurations, and settling cases to permit devices like forced-reset triggers. ATF Director Robert Cekada and Acting AG Todd Blanche have made clear that the Second Amendment is “not a second-class right” under the Trump administration and are pushing reforms that enhance, rather than undermine, law enforcement’s core mission.

These moves represent the common-sense philosophy of trusting law-abiding citizens, enforcing laws rigorously against criminals, and dismantling the administrative state’s infringement apparatus. Gun ownership surged during the COVID-19 pandemic, including among women and minorities, reflecting Americans’ recognition that self-reliance, not government dependence, ensures security. Firearm-related homicides have continued declining trends even as enforcement shifted, underscoring that armed, responsible citizens deter crime more effectively than bureaucratic harassment.

By appointing justices who respect originalism, repealing punitive taxes, litigating against state infringements, and defanging the ATF, President Trump has strengthened the foundational right that secures all others. The Founders understood an armed populace as a bulwark against tyranny; Trump’s unheralded successes honor that wisdom. As America First policies deliver peace through strength abroad and prosperity at home, the restoration of Second Amendment freedoms stands as a quiet triumph. Law-abiding gun owners—hunters, sport shooters, families in high-crime areas, and patriots defending their homes—owe a great debt to President Trump. This is not the end of the fight, but a golden age for constitutional carry and self-defense has come to fruition. The media may ignore it, and certain perpetually-enraged conservative voices may not realize it, but history will record President Trump’s 2nd Amendment success as among his greatest legacies in empowering the people, not big government.

A new study has revealed the most and least expensive places to satisfy your love of pizza.

Pizza is arguably one of the most popular foods in the United States, but prices vary wildly, not just from state to state, but from restaurant to restaurant. Now, a U.S. Pizza Index from online lending platform NetCredit has revealed “where a medium-cheese pizza from one of the nation’s 10 largest pizza chains is the most and least affordable” by city and state. The platform utilized pricing information from Grubhub and DoorDash across 180 cities, which includes the 100 largest cities as well as the three largest cities in each state.

Key takeaways from the study:

Some of the most shocking data comes when comparing prices from Hawaii and Indiana, according to the findings.

“Hawaii’s average pizza is 4.5% more expensive than California’s and 41.2% more than Indiana ($13.95), the state with the most budget-friendly pizza, based on our study,” the outlet noted. The price can reportedly be attributed to the cost of shipping, as the state imports up to 90% of its food.

Of the major US cities, Houston, Texas, is among the cheapest places to enjoy a slice, which is in line with its generally low cost of living.

“We found ten cities where the average pizza costs under $15, and three of them are in Texas. Indeed, Houston’s average medium cheese pizza costs just $14.42, the lowest among the major cities profiled. Houston has a low cost of living in general, and the big pizza chains are forced to offer competitive prices by a growing raft of independent pizzerias offering a more personal touch,” NetCredit explained.

If you’re looking for the leader of low-cost pizza, look no further than Little Caesars. They offer the most affordable pizza (at $10.27 for a medium cheese) on average, with runner-up Papa John’s clocking in at 17% higher with $12.38 for the same pie. They are also a whopping “45.9% or more cheaper than Pizza Hut or Domino’s,” NetCredit adds.

For those looking to save money on their next pizza order, the outlet has some tips, including “ordering bigger pizzas” and buying sides and drinks from the store. Many chains offer coupons and other deals that can help lower costs, while making pizza at home could be a significantly cheaper option if you have the time to spare.