Alexander Vindman, the CIA-approved “whistleblower” who facilitated Trump’s impeachment hearings, is considering a run for U.S. Senate in Florida during next year’s midterms.

Vindman, whose brother Eugene is a Congressman in Virginia’s 7th Congressional District, hopes that he can galvanize anger against President Trump and achieve an unlikely upset running for U.S. Senate in the Trump stronghold of Florida.

“I think that the Democrats need to win in some very, very difficult places in order to wrestle control back,” Vindman told CBS News Miami. “I’m not sure if Florida is the place to do that. It might be. My worldview is that Trump is going to hurt a lot of people, and this will be a referendum [on Trump] and there’ll be an opportunity for people power to manifest.”

“Folks will show up that stayed on the sidelines last time, or that got more than they bargained for with Donald Trump. So, I don’t think the state is too far gone by any means. I certainly don’t believe that. I just don’t know if I’m the right person to do that or if that’s the right role for me,” Vindman continued.

MAGA supporters should not be afraid of Vindman running for office. In fact, they should be welcoming his foray into electoral politics. A U.S. Senate run for Vindman would allow Trump supporters to expose his fraudulent record and participation in the deep state conspiracy to remove a sitting President from office using deceit and malice.

Vindman was never the heroic whistleblower that he was portrayed to be by the deep state and the complicit fake news media. Vindman cynically fed information to now-disgraced CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella. Ciaramella was infamously exposed for his conversation with colleague Sean Misko about the need to get rid of President Trump following his inauguration because they wished to undermine his America First foreign policy and national security agenda.

“Just days after he was sworn in they were already talking about trying to get rid of him,” said a White House insider who heard the conversation told Real Clear Politics.

Vindman, then serving on the National Security Council, knew Ciaramella was the perfect stooly who could launder his misinformation and serve as the phony whistleblower to destroy Trump. He seized upon a call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, taking words out of context in an attempt to build the case against Trump. Vindman fed Ciaramella the information needed for the media to make him the phony whistleblower, and the conspiracy was on.

“Vindman was the person on the call who went to the whistleblower after the call, to give the whistleblower the information he needed to file his complaint,” said EPA Director Lee Zeldin, then a sitting U.S. Congressman.

Adam Schiff coordinated the phony whistleblower plot to create the impeachment circus meant to oust Trump. Schiff publicly stated that he wanted the whistleblower to speak publicly only to do an about face after news leaked that he coordinated with the whistleblower ahead of the complaint and could be held legally liable for this unethical behavior. It became clear that the main witnesses in the impeachment case were career bureaucrats who were in fact responsible for the entire investigation at the same time, highly immoral and outright treasonous behavior.

“They are fact witnesses in the same investigation that they are now running. Nowhere else in the United States of America can you be both a fact witness and the prosecutor or investigation in anything, much less an investigation to remove a President from office. It is entirely inappropriate, and Chairman Schiff should be disqualified from running an investigation where his committee, members or staff, are fact witnesses about contact with the whistleblower and the whistleblower process,” current CIA Director John Ratcliffe said in 2019 when he served as a U.S. Congressman.

All America First Republicans should welcome Vindman’s run for U.S. Senate. It will allow the ability to dredge this important information up and elevate it within the public consciousness. What Vindman orchestrated was nothing short of a coup attempt. He is an enemy of the Republic, and the blood on his hands should not be overlooked because of his weak, sad, doughy physique and dainty, effeminate demeanor.

The masses must not forget how vile these deep state actors are as it is the only way they will support their inevitable punishment. The media distraction machine must not remove our eyes from the ultimate goal: the dispatching of America’s enemies. Vindman represents our corrupted system of government at its vilest and most cowardly, and his arrogance may ultimately lead to his downfall as his Senate run may put the figurative noose around his neck.

Former Trump adviser Roger Stone accused ex-FBI chief James Comey of deliberately posting a coded threat against President Trump on Newsmax Saturday, calling Comey’s claims of ignorance “disgraceful” amid Secret Service scrutiny.

Stone sharply criticized former FBI Director James Comey Saturday, saying Comey, a Republican, was fully aware of the implications behind a controversial social media post now under investigation by the Secret Service.

Speaking on “Saturday Report,” Stone responded to recent remarks by the Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who called for Comey’s arrest after the former FBI chief shared and quickly deleted a photo on Instagram. The image, which showed seashells arranged to spell “8647,” drew immediate backlash from Republicans who interpreted it as an incitement to violence against President Donald Trump — the 47th president.

Stone directly disputed Comey’s claim that he did not know the meaning behind the numbers. “’86’ is not an old bartender’s term,” Stone stated emphatically. “It’s a mafia term for whacking somebody, terminating them. He knew exactly what he was doing.”

Stone further highlighted the seriousness of Comey’s post, given recent threats against the president. “I think this is particularly serious in view of the fact that there have been two very serious assassination attempts against President Donald Trump,” Stone remarked, expressing concern that Comey’s actions could encourage further attempts.

Comey’s Instagram post initially appeared innocuous, captioned: “Cool shell formation on my beach walk.” Yet, according to Merriam-Webster, “86” is widely understood slang meaning “to reject,” “get rid of,” and more recently, “to kill,” prompting criticism from Trump supporters.

Stone also suggested Comey’s actions were driven by a desire for publicity, accusing the former FBI chief of seeking attention ahead of a forthcoming book. “His previous two books have been ignominious commercial failures,” Stone said, suggesting Comey was exploiting controversy for personal gain.

Despite his pointed criticism, Stone expressed skepticism that Comey would face prosecution. “Frankly, I think that he is so confident that he will not be prosecuted,” Stone observed.

While acknowledging due process, Stone drew parallels to his controversial statements concerning Senator Mark Kelly, whom he accused of involvement with Chinese firms producing spy balloons. “I suggested that [Kelly] would be tried and, if convicted, punished,” Stone recalled. “I pointed out that on the law books, the penalty for treason is capital punishment. I was harshly criticized.”

Stone concluded by reiterating the gravity of Comey’s actions. “This is disgraceful because it could very well encourage some deranged individual to try to kill our president,” he stated. “Comey knows that — he knows exactly what he was doing.”

As the Secret Service continues its investigation into Comey’s social media post, the controversy highlights ongoing tensions between President Trump’s administration and prominent former government officials.

I remember reading somewhere that there were those working with James Comey who referred to him as “St. James” Comey because of his absolute certainty that he was always right about everything and had an insufferably smug way of letting you know it. Seemed credible at the time. Seems more credible now.

Here’s how Amazon describes his non-fiction book, A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies, and Leadership:

“Good, ethical” leaders don’t do these things:

If it’s hard for you to read what is on the image, this is the list of Comey’s “crimes,” and I honestly have a hard time seeing where the poster is wrong about the criminal element here:

“Lying to Congress

Leaking classified memos

Illegally surveilling the Trump campaign

Leaking classified memos

Illegally surveilling the Trump campaign

Covering for Hillary Clinton

Weaponizing the FBI against political opponents

Playing politics with justice

Now: “86 47”

If FBI Director Kash Patel had done even a whisper of any of these things against, say, President Obama, or on Trump’s behalf, or, indeed, on behalf of any Republican, he’d be in custody awaiting trial. Zero doubt.

So why hasn’t “St. James” Comey been treated to a Roger Stone Jr. type pre-dawn raid with heavily armed agents, flash bangs, and poor Mrs. Stone shivering in her nightgown for the miraculously on-scene CNN cameras? I’m sure Mrs. Comey wouldn’t mind having her underwear drawer rifled through as the FBI did to Mrs. Trump during the Mar-a-Lago raid. After all, if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear, right? That’s what they kept telling us.

There are serious gaps in the story of the Butler shooting, so serious that many—many—have speculated that the only way that young man could’ve gotten his shots off is if he was allowed to, wink-wink-nod-nod, and that would mean…an inside job. So, it’s no joke, not even close, that a former FBI Director messages about “86-ing” the sitting president. The Secret Service can’t afford to be wrong.

Add in Comey’s years of very strange public behavior, from him laughing at setting up General Flynn to a whole string of very strange photo posts of his back staring at an empty field, his back, again, standing in the middle of a road and whatnot, and any law enforcement agency worth its salt would have to have their radar up about this guy who just “86’d” “47” in shells on the beach.

This is not the behavior of a stable man. Add in, too, Comey’s unnaturally high opinion of himself, and any sensible person would truly have to wonder about how reliably sane he is.

How do they know for sure he’s not signaling someone? Answer? They don’t. And they have to be sure.

That’s why, in my humble opinion, he needs to have the snot scared out of him. He needs to have a very harsh interrogation. I’m not talking anything crazy or illegal. Just harsh enough to scare a coward like him, so it wouldn’t take anything exotic.

We seem to have fallen into this habit of giving our leaders a pass on their bad behavior when, really, it should be the opposite: because they are given our trust in an elevated position with power, they should be subject to harsher, not softer standards.

Our “loyalty” should be higher, alright. To a principle: The principle of right and wrong. The principle of law and order. The shoe-on-the-other-foot rule should absolutely apply whenever our leaders misbehave and, as stated earlier, there’s zero doubt that had Kash been FBI Director under Obama and did half of what was done to Trump, Kash would be sitting in a federal prison right this minute.

“Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair,” said General George Washington at the Constitutional Convention. He was talking about setting a high standard in the document they were toiling over, so if it all went south, generations to come could “repair” or return to our original intent, which was, and remains, noble indeed.

Well, here we are. The wise and honest have their standard. Let us repair to it.