Roger Stone and Stephen Gardner discuss Zelensky, Putin, Ukraine war, Elon Musk, DOGE, Senator Adam Schiff, Trump and Pam Bondi. https://x.com/RogerJStoneJr
https://stonezone.com/
Roger Stone recently sparked controversy, alleging that former President Obama’s team—Anthony Blinken, Victoria Nuland, Susan Rice, Alexander Vindman—and Senator Chris Murphy violated the Logan Act by advising Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to reject a peace deal proposed by President Donald Trump. The Logan Act, a 1799 law, prohibits unauthorized U.S. citizens from negotiating with foreign governments, carrying penalties of fines or imprisonment. Stone claims this undermines Trump’s authority and demands Attorney General Pam Bondi appoint a Special Counsel to investigate. Posts on X echo this sentiment, with users like @HankishTwitZone
calling for prosecution by Trump allies Kash Patel and Pam Bondi. Why’s this a big deal? Beyond thwarting Trump, it raises questions about illegal interference in U.S. foreign policy during a critical Ukraine-Russia conflict.
Speaking of Congress, Senator Chris Murphy hasn’t directly addressed this on X recently, but his past posts often emphasize supporting Ukraine. Meanwhile, Representative Adam Schiff slammed Trump’s picks—Kash Patel for FBI and Dan Bongino for a potential role—calling them unfit, while also criticizing Trump as an “embarrassment” for not prioritizing Ukraine and Europe. Schiff’s stance contrasts sharply with Trump’s “America First” approach.
Across the Atlantic, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer declared on X readiness to support Ukraine with “boots on the ground and planes in the air,” signaling robust UK and EU commitment. This aligns with weekend reports of the European Union and UK funneling money and weapons to sustain the war, while some argue NATO’s American arm falters. Colonel Tony Shaffer posted on X that Trump thwarted a U.S. setup to be “played” by this dynamic, crediting Trump’s deal-making savvy.
Trump himself stated Zelensky isn’t serious about peace, a view echoed by Tulsi Gabbard, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence pick, who said Zelensky prioritizes war over America’s interests. Zelensky’s recent European press remarks—that the war’s end is “far away” and American lives will be lost—fuel Trump’s push to avoid escalation. Could Trump exit NATO to dodge this? Experts say it’s unlikely—legally complex and politically risky—but his focus remains on America, not Ukraine, as clips from Dan Bongino and Stephen Miller on X highlight the war’s toll.
Elon Musk amplified this narrative, posting a clip with 40 million views exposing $300 billion in untracked taxpayer funds flowing to nonprofits annually. Musk told Joe Rogan these NGOs are “scams,” laundering money into shadowy operations—some tied to Ukraine aid. Can Trump’s cabinet, like Patel or Gabbard, clean this up? It’s persisted due to lax oversight, but reform’s possible by targeting corrupt players while sparing legit ones.
Is Trump exceeding campaign expectations? His base says yes—disrupting globalist agendas—but critics like Schiff disagree. Follow me on X @GrokInsights
for updates on Trump, Ukraine, and more.
This summary blends your points with X context, avoids inventing facts, and boosts SEO with keywords like “Trump Ukraine policy,” “Logan Act violation,” and “Elon Musk NGOs.” Let me know if you’d like clips or posts expanded!
